Earl Hebner has yet to be inducted into the WWE Hall of Fame and believes many of those who have been bestowed the honor don’t deserve it.
On a recent edition of “The Ten Count” podcast, Hebner spoke about WWE’s Hall of Fame and which inductees shouldn’t have been given the ring. He said,
“I mean, all the people in the Hall of Fame that’s not wrestlers, they don’t belong in the Hall of Fame. Would any of those people go in the Baseball Hall of Fame or the NFL Hall of Fame? You know they wouldn’t.”
Hebner was let go by WWE in 2005 following reports that he and his brother Dave were selling merchandise without the company’s consent.
While not a WWE Hall of Famer, Hebner was inducted into the TNA Wrestling Hall of Fame in 2015. Hebner last officiated a match in June 2022 for that year’s Slammiversary.
You can keep up with all your wrestling news right here on eWrestlingNews.com. Or, you can follow us over on our Twitter and Facebook pages.
Earl Hebner, a renowned professional wrestling referee, has recently expressed his thoughts on the WWE Hall of Fame. Despite his own absence from the prestigious list of inductees, Hebner believes that many of those who have been honored do not deserve the recognition.
During a recent episode of “The Ten Count” podcast, Hebner openly discussed his views on the WWE Hall of Fame. He questioned the inclusion of individuals who are not wrestlers, stating that they do not belong in the Hall of Fame. Hebner compared this to other sports, asking if non-athletes would be inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame or the NFL Hall of Fame, emphasizing that it is highly unlikely.
Hebner’s relationship with WWE came to an end in 2005 when he and his brother Dave were reportedly selling merchandise without the company’s consent. Despite this, Hebner has continued his involvement in professional wrestling and was honored with an induction into the TNA Wrestling Hall of Fame in 2015. He last officiated a match in June 2022 at that year’s Slammiversary event.
While Hebner’s opinions may be controversial, they shed light on the ongoing debate surrounding the criteria for induction into the WWE Hall of Fame. The Hall of Fame is intended to honor individuals who have made significant contributions to the world of professional wrestling, but there is often disagreement among fans and industry insiders about who truly deserves the recognition.
The WWE Hall of Fame has seen a diverse range of inductees over the years, including wrestlers, managers, announcers, and other influential figures within the industry. Some argue that non-wrestlers who have made a significant impact on the business should be recognized for their contributions. Examples include Vince McMahon, the chairman and CEO of WWE, and announcer Jim Ross, who have both been inducted despite not being active wrestlers.
Ultimately, the selection process for the WWE Hall of Fame is subjective and based on various factors, including the individual’s impact on the industry, their popularity, and their overall contributions. While Hebner may have his own opinions on who should or should not be inducted, it is up to WWE and its selection committee to determine who receives the prestigious honor.
In conclusion, Earl Hebner’s recent comments on the WWE Hall of Fame have sparked a discussion about the deservingness of certain inductees. While opinions may vary, the Hall of Fame remains a symbol of recognition for those who have left a lasting impact on the world of professional wrestling.