Mandy Rose has been away from wrestling since WWE let her go in December 2022, right after she lost her NXT Women’s Championship to Roxanne Perez.
The reason WWE released her was due to some risque content she was sharing on her FanTime website.
In a video package for Tatum Paxley that aired on WWE NXT last week, WWE listed several past NXT Women’s Champions, but Rose wasn’t listed. Mandy talked about it while appearing on the Power Alphas podcast.
“I also think it’s kind of funny and hypocritical where like you can’t get recognized on TV. Let’s say, you know, including my name in that long list of superstars but yet you can still sell my merch and action figures for the rest of my life. That part really gets me a little bit in a sense. Like, you’re gonna be able to sell my stuff for the rest of my life but yet you can’t even showcase, like, or say my name?”
Title: Mandy Rose Opens Up About WWE’s Hypocrisy and Merchandise Sales
Introduction:
Former WWE wrestler Mandy Rose recently spoke out about her absence from wrestling since her release from the company in December 2022. In a podcast appearance, she addressed the discrepancy between being excluded from a video package while still having her merchandise and action figures sold by WWE. This article delves into the details of Mandy Rose’s comments and explores the implications of WWE’s decision.
Body:
Mandy Rose, who had a successful stint in WWE’s NXT division, found herself at the center of controversy when the company released her following her loss of the NXT Women’s Championship to Roxanne Perez. The reason behind her departure was reportedly related to risqué content she shared on her FanTime website.
Recently, during an appearance on the Power Alphas podcast, Rose expressed her frustration with WWE’s treatment of her. She highlighted the irony of not being recognized on television while still having her merchandise and action figures sold by the company. This discrepancy raises questions about WWE’s handling of talent and their merchandise rights.
Rose stated, “I also think it’s kind of funny and hypocritical where you can’t get recognized on TV, let’s say, including my name in that long list of superstars, but yet you can still sell my merch and action figures for the rest of my life. That part really gets me a little bit in a sense. Like, you’re gonna be able to sell my stuff for the rest of my life but yet you can’t even showcase or say my name?”
The former NXT Women’s Champion’s comments shed light on an issue that has been a topic of discussion within the wrestling community. While WWE has released Rose from her contract, they continue to profit from her likeness through merchandise sales. This raises concerns about the fairness of such arrangements and the rights of wrestlers to control their own image.
Wrestlers often rely on merchandise sales as a significant source of income, and WWE’s ability to continue profiting from Rose’s merchandise without acknowledging her on television raises ethical questions. It also highlights the power dynamics within the wrestling industry, where talent may have limited control over their own brand and likeness.
Furthermore, Rose’s comments bring attention to the need for transparency and consistency in WWE’s treatment of their talent. If the company is willing to profit from a wrestler’s merchandise, it seems only fair that they should also acknowledge and promote them on their television programming.
Conclusion:
Mandy Rose’s recent comments on the Power Alphas podcast have sparked a conversation about WWE’s treatment of their talent and the ethical implications of continuing to sell merchandise without recognizing them on television. The discrepancy between being excluded from a video package while still having her merchandise and action figures sold raises concerns about fairness and control over one’s own image. As the wrestling industry continues to evolve, it is crucial for companies like WWE to address these issues and ensure transparency and consistency in their treatment of talent.