WWE should find a way to keep the popular Rhea Ripley appearing on TV despite her injury, according to former WWE writer Vince Russo.
On last week’s episode of WWE RAW, Ripley disclosed the injury that she suffered during the previous week’s backstage attack by Liv Morgan.
During a recent edition of the “WrestleBinge” podcast, Russo argued in favor of keeping the ‘Mami’ of the Judgment Day around. He said,
“Bro, back in the Attitude Era, if somebody got hurt, they were still on the show. They just wouldn’t wrestle. We did that all the time. If Austin would get hurt or The Rock, I would say, ‘Okay, they’re gonna be on the show, we’ll write them on the show. They’re just not gonna wrestle.’
“Rhea Ripley is a huge star. Why can’t they write for her without having her wrestle? I don’t understand this… Why isn’t she on the show now? She’s got her arm in a sling, she can’t get on an airplane.”
On this week’s edition of RAW, Becky Lynch won a battle royal to become the new WWE Women’s World Champion. Her victory prompted a response by Rhea Ripley.
Title: WWE Should Find Creative Solutions to Keep Rhea Ripley on TV, Suggests Former Writer
Introduction
Former WWE writer Vince Russo has suggested that the company should find a way to keep popular superstar Rhea Ripley appearing on television despite her recent injury. Russo believes that in the past, injured wrestlers would still make appearances on shows, even if they couldn’t compete in matches. This article explores Russo’s viewpoint and discusses the potential benefits of keeping Ripley involved in WWE programming.
Rhea Ripley’s Injury and Russo’s Argument
During a recent episode of WWE RAW, Rhea Ripley revealed that she had suffered an injury as a result of a backstage attack by Liv Morgan. This news left fans wondering about Ripley’s future appearances on the show. However, Vince Russo, a former WWE writer, expressed his opinion on the matter during an episode of the “WrestleBinge” podcast.
Russo drew comparisons to the Attitude Era, a highly popular period in WWE history, where injured wrestlers would still make appearances on television. They might not compete in matches, but their presence would add value to the show. Russo believes that Rhea Ripley, being a huge star, should continue to be written into storylines even if she cannot wrestle due to her injury.
The Potential Benefits
Russo’s argument highlights the potential benefits of keeping Ripley involved in WWE programming despite her injury. By having her appear on television, the company can maintain her popularity and keep her character relevant in the minds of fans. This approach would also allow Ripley to continue building her fan base and maintain her connection with the audience.
Furthermore, keeping Ripley on TV without wrestling could provide an opportunity for character development and storytelling. The creative team could explore different angles and narratives for Ripley’s character, allowing her to evolve and grow even without physical competition. This approach would not only keep Ripley engaged but also keep fans invested in her journey.
Response to Becky Lynch’s Victory
In the most recent episode of RAW, Becky Lynch won a battle royal to become the new WWE Women’s World Champion. This victory prompted a response from Rhea Ripley, who took shots at Lynch and Liv Morgan. Despite her injury, Ripley’s involvement in the storyline demonstrates her ability to contribute to the show in a non-physical capacity.
Conclusion
Former WWE writer Vince Russo’s suggestion that Rhea Ripley should continue appearing on television despite her injury raises an interesting point. By finding creative solutions to keep Ripley involved, WWE can maintain her popularity, develop her character, and keep fans engaged. While it remains to be seen how WWE will handle Ripley’s injury, the potential benefits of Russo’s idea are worth considering. Fans will eagerly await updates on Ripley’s future appearances and the creative direction WWE takes with her character.