Taz had to be convinced to ‘no-sell’ a piledriver by Jerry ‘The King’ Lawler when the two men faced off at WWF SummerSlam 2000.
The pair feuded in 2000 after Taz took exception to being labeled a ‘thug’ on commentary by JR, and at one point smashed glass in the face of the Oklahoma native.
On Twitter, Taz commented on his infamous no-selling of Lawler’s signature piledriver and made it clear the idea wasn’t his.
So here is the deal with this ancient history NO SELL spot… I’ve done it several times with King… and NOT one of those times was it my idea. Each time I had to be heavily convinced in long conversations to do it. https://t.co/uYSp2ttjkS
— taz (@OfficialTAZ) October 22, 2023
While Taz would no-sell the move, Lawler would win the match thanks to interference from JR, while Taz won the rematch at next month’s Unforgiven pay-per-view event.
You can keep up with all your wrestling news right here on eWrestlingNews.com. Or, you can follow us over on our Twitter and Facebook pages.
In the world of professional wrestling, there have been countless memorable moments and matches that have left a lasting impact on fans. One such moment occurred at WWF SummerSlam 2000 when Jerry ‘The King’ Lawler faced off against Taz.
The feud between Lawler and Taz began in 2000 when Taz took offense to being labeled a ‘thug’ on commentary by Jim Ross. This led to a heated rivalry between the two wrestlers, with Taz even going as far as smashing glass in Lawler’s face during their feud.
However, one of the most talked-about moments from their match at SummerSlam 2000 was when Taz had to be convinced to ‘no-sell’ Lawler’s signature piledriver move. In professional wrestling, ‘no-selling’ refers to a wrestler not reacting or selling the impact of their opponent’s moves, creating a dramatic effect.
On Twitter, Taz himself commented on this infamous moment and revealed that the idea to no-sell Lawler’s piledriver was not his own. He stated that he had to be heavily convinced in long conversations to go along with the spot. This insight into the behind-the-scenes discussions sheds light on the collaborative nature of professional wrestling and how decisions are made for the sake of entertainment.
Despite Taz no-selling the piledriver, Lawler would ultimately win the match thanks to interference from Jim Ross. However, Taz would get his revenge by winning the rematch at the following month’s Unforgiven pay-per-view event.
This moment between Lawler and Taz is just one example of the excitement and drama that professional wrestling brings to its fans. It showcases the creativity and storytelling involved in creating memorable matches and moments that keep audiences engaged.
If you’re a wrestling fan looking for more news and updates, you can stay up-to-date with all the latest happenings in the world of wrestling on eWrestlingNews.com. Additionally, you can follow them on their Twitter and Facebook pages to get even more wrestling content.
In conclusion, the no-selling of Lawler’s piledriver by Taz at WWF SummerSlam 2000 is a fascinating moment in professional wrestling history. It highlights the collaborative nature of the industry and the dedication of wrestlers to entertain their fans.