The Perspective of Gerald Brisco: Vince McMahon’s Disdain for Yes Men

The Perspective of Gerald Brisco: Vince McMahon’s Disdain for Yes Men
>> Click Here To Bet On Pro Wrestling and More! <<
– ADVERTISMENT –

Contrary to what CM Punk would have you believe, Vince McMahon has always loathed ‘yes men’, according to WWE Hall of Famer Gerald Brisco.

On a recent edition of the “Under the Ring” podcast, Brisco was asked about his tenure working with the WWE/TKO Group Chairman. He said,

– ADVERTISEMENT –


“Vince McMahon hated yes guys. I mean, he had them. Yeah, he had them, but did he depend on them? No. He depended on more of the guys, like Pat Patterson … and Bruce Prichard. Bruce Prichard is not a yes-man.”

During his 2011 pipebomb promo, CM Punk infamously claimed that Vince McMahon surrounds himself with “glad-handed, nonsensical, d*uchebag yes men like John Laurinaitis.”

You can keep up with all your wrestling news right here on eWrestlingNews.com. Or, you can follow us over on our Twitter and Facebook pages.

– ADVERTISEMENT –


In the world of professional wrestling, Vince McMahon is a name that carries immense weight. As the Chairman of WWE/TKO Group, McMahon has been at the helm of the wrestling industry for decades, shaping it into the global phenomenon it is today. However, there has always been speculation about McMahon’s management style and whether he surrounds himself with “yes men”. WWE Hall of Famer Gerald Brisco sheds some light on this topic.

Contrary to popular belief, Brisco reveals that McMahon actually despises “yes men”. In a recent episode of the “Under the Ring” podcast, Brisco discussed his experience working with McMahon and stated, “Vince McMahon hated yes guys. I mean, he had them, but did he depend on them? No.” This statement challenges the perception that McMahon only surrounds himself with individuals who unquestioningly agree with him.

Brisco goes on to mention two individuals whom McMahon relied on heavily – Pat Patterson and Bruce Prichard. According to Brisco, these individuals were not “yes men” but rather valuable assets to McMahon. Patterson and Prichard brought their expertise and unique perspectives to the table, which McMahon appreciated and respected.

This revelation contradicts CM Punk’s infamous pipebomb promo from 2011, where he accused McMahon of surrounding himself with “glad-handed, nonsensical, d*uchebag yes men like John Laurinaitis”. Punk’s scathing remarks fueled speculation about McMahon’s leadership style and his preference for individuals who simply agree with him.

It is important to note that every leader has their own management style, and McMahon is no exception. While there may have been instances where McMahon relied on individuals who aligned with his vision, it is clear that he also values diverse opinions and expertise. The success of WWE speaks for itself, as it has become a global entertainment powerhouse under McMahon’s guidance.

As fans of professional wrestling, it is crucial to understand the complexities of the industry and the individuals who shape it. McMahon’s leadership style, as described by Brisco, showcases a more nuanced perspective on his management approach. It highlights the importance of surrounding oneself with knowledgeable and talented individuals who can contribute to the growth and success of an organization.

In conclusion, Vince McMahon’s alleged preference for “yes men” is debunked by WWE Hall of Famer Gerald Brisco. Brisco’s insights shed light on McMahon’s management style, revealing that he values individuals like Pat Patterson and Bruce Prichard who bring their expertise and diverse perspectives to the table. This revelation challenges the perception of McMahon as a leader who only surrounds himself with individuals who unquestioningly agree with him. Ultimately, McMahon’s success in the wrestling industry speaks for itself, showcasing the effectiveness of his leadership style.