WWE Hall of Famer Eric Bischoff disagrees with the notion that Vince McMahon has ‘shunned’ people and believes the notion is a “bad take.”
McMahon has often been accused of shunning ex-Superstars who may have left WWE on bad terms, with Chyna’s name often being brought up by fans.
The Ninth Wonder of the World did not receive a solo induction into the WWE Hall of Fame and when DX was inducted in 2019, many blamed McMahon for this.
On a recent edition of his “Strictly Business” podcast, Bischoff argued that Chyna’s lack of a solo induction downplayed the idea that McMahon is to ‘blame’. He said,
“People are reading too much into that. I don’t think any shunning is going on. It’s subjective. I think anyone that deserves to get in, will get in. I don’t think Vince McMahon has shunned anyone. I think that’s a bad take.”
You can keep up with all your wrestling news right here on eWrestlingNews.com. Or, you can follow us over on our Twitter and Facebook pages.
In the world of professional wrestling, Vince McMahon, the chairman and CEO of WWE, has often been accused of shunning ex-Superstars who may have left the company on bad terms. One name that frequently comes up in these discussions is Chyna, the Ninth Wonder of the World. Chyna did not receive a solo induction into the WWE Hall of Fame, and when her faction DX was inducted in 2019, many fans blamed McMahon for this perceived snub.
However, WWE Hall of Famer Eric Bischoff disagrees with the notion that McMahon has shunned people. In a recent episode of his podcast “Strictly Business,” Bischoff argued that Chyna’s lack of a solo induction does not necessarily mean McMahon is to blame. He believes that people are reading too much into it and that it is a subjective matter. According to Bischoff, anyone who deserves to be inducted into the Hall of Fame will eventually get in, and he does not think McMahon has intentionally shunned anyone.
Bischoff’s perspective challenges the popular narrative surrounding McMahon’s alleged shunning of certain wrestlers. While it is true that there have been instances where ex-Superstars have had strained relationships with WWE and were not given the recognition they may have deserved, Bischoff suggests that it may not be as black and white as it seems.
It is important to consider that the WWE Hall of Fame induction process is ultimately controlled by McMahon and the company. The criteria for induction can vary, and personal relationships and past issues may influence the decision-making process. However, Bischoff’s argument highlights the subjectivity of the situation and suggests that it is not solely McMahon’s responsibility to determine who gets inducted.
The debate surrounding McMahon’s alleged shunning practices raises questions about the fairness and transparency of the WWE Hall of Fame. Fans and critics alike have expressed their opinions on who should be inducted and have called for greater recognition of certain wrestlers. While it is impossible to please everyone, Bischoff’s perspective encourages a more nuanced understanding of the situation.
In conclusion, Eric Bischoff’s disagreement with the notion that Vince McMahon has shunned people in WWE challenges the prevailing narrative. Bischoff believes that the lack of solo induction for Chyna and other wrestlers should not be automatically attributed to McMahon’s actions. The subjectivity of the WWE Hall of Fame induction process and the complexities of personal relationships within the industry make it a multifaceted issue. Ultimately, the debate surrounding McMahon’s alleged shunning practices highlights the ongoing discussion about fairness and transparency in professional wrestling.