Are there too many championships in wrestling today, which is leading to titles becoming less important? Arn Anderson believes so.
On his “ARN” podcast, Anderson spoke about a time in the early 1990s when WCW had two World Championships: a WCW World Championship & the NWA Worlds Championship.
During his show, Anderson argued that this was an example of too many championships, an issue he feels has continued to this day. He said,
“Just one title. There’s always been too many. One makes that one mean even that much more, in my opinion. Even that applies today in whatever company you’re talking about. The less titles you have, the more value they have.”
WWE currently has two top championships: Roman Reigns’ Undisputed WWE Universal Championship and Seth Rollins’ WWE World Heavyweight Championship.
While AEW only has one official World Championship, CM Punk was calling himself the ‘Real World Champion’ prior to his release from the company last month.
You can keep up with all your wrestling news right here on eWrestlingNews.com. Or, you can follow us over on our Twitter and Facebook pages.
In the world of professional wrestling, championships have always played a significant role in determining the top performers and creating compelling storylines. However, there has been a growing debate among fans and industry insiders about whether there are too many championships in wrestling today, leading to titles becoming less important. Legendary wrestler Arn Anderson recently shared his thoughts on this matter on his podcast, “ARN,” shedding light on the issue.
Anderson discussed a time in the early 1990s when WCW (World Championship Wrestling) had two World Championships: the WCW World Championship and the NWA (National Wrestling Alliance) Worlds Championship. He argued that having multiple world titles diluted their significance and made them less valuable. According to Anderson, “Just one title. There’s always been too many. One makes that one mean even that much more, in my opinion. Even that applies today in whatever company you’re talking about. The less titles you have, the more value they have.”
This sentiment raises an interesting point. Currently, WWE (World Wrestling Entertainment) has two top championships: Roman Reigns’ Undisputed WWE Universal Championship and Seth Rollins’ WWE World Heavyweight Championship. While both titles hold prestige, some argue that having two top championships waters down their importance and makes it harder for fans to invest in the storylines surrounding them.
On the other hand, AEW (All Elite Wrestling), a rising competitor to WWE, only has one official World Championship. However, CM Punk, a former AEW wrestler, referred to himself as the “Real World Champion” before his departure from the company last month. This situation highlights how even with a single world title, additional factors can still diminish its significance.
The concern over the number of championships in wrestling is not limited to major promotions like WWE and AEW. Many independent wrestling promotions also have multiple titles within their organizations. While this may provide more opportunities for wrestlers to showcase their skills and achieve success, it can also lead to a saturation of championships and a lack of focus on the most prestigious titles.
Having fewer championships could potentially enhance the value and prestige of each title. It would allow for more meaningful and intense rivalries, as wrestlers would be vying for a limited number of top honors. Fans would have a clearer understanding of who the true top performers are, and the stakes in championship matches would be higher.
However, it is essential to strike a balance. Completely eliminating titles may not be the solution either, as it could limit opportunities for wrestlers to shine and create diverse storylines. The key lies in finding the right number of championships that maintains their importance while still providing ample opportunities for talent to showcase their skills.
In conclusion, the debate over the number of championships in professional wrestling continues to be a topic of discussion among fans and industry insiders. Arn Anderson’s perspective on the matter sheds light on the potential impact of having too many titles. While having fewer championships could enhance their value, it is crucial to strike a balance that allows for meaningful storylines and opportunities for wrestlers. As the wrestling landscape evolves, finding the right equilibrium will be crucial in ensuring that championships remain a significant aspect of the industry.