Al Snow has shared his criticism of deathmatch wrestling, which he believes is a phase that will inevitably die out as expectations increase.
On a recent edition of the “Insight” podcast, Snow explained why he feels deathmatches are inferior to more traditional in-ring contests. He said,
“What we’re really selling — what an audience is wanting to believe in — is that we’re prize fighters, [and] … we’re under a governing organization. There’s no governing body that would do a sporting event that would allow you to use a cinder block and hit another man in the testicles to allow a win.
“I think it is a phase. It’s a very, very niche audience. … It’s very entropic. It’s a snake eating its own tail because, at some point, you can’t keep raising the bar.”
Snow also recalled a conversation with Sabu in ECW in which he said that breaking tables every night would eventually result in the crowd demanding more violence.
You can keep up with all your wrestling news right here on eWrestlingNews.com. Or, you can follow us over on our Twitter and Facebook pages.
Deathmatch wrestling has been a controversial topic in the world of professional wrestling for many years. While some fans enjoy the extreme violence and brutality of these matches, others argue that they are detrimental to the sport. Recently, former wrestler Al Snow shared his criticism of deathmatch wrestling, predicting that it is just a phase that will eventually die out.
In a recent episode of the “Insight” podcast, Snow expressed his belief that deathmatches are inferior to more traditional in-ring contests. He argued that professional wrestling is about portraying prize fighters under a governing organization, and using weapons like cinder blocks to win a match goes against the principles of the sport.
Snow also highlighted the niche audience that deathmatch wrestling attracts. While there are fans who enjoy this style of wrestling, it is not as widely accepted or popular as traditional wrestling. He compared it to a snake eating its own tail, suggesting that the constant need to raise the bar in terms of violence and brutality will eventually reach a point where it becomes unsustainable.
To support his argument, Snow recalled a conversation he had with fellow wrestler Sabu during their time in Extreme Championship Wrestling (ECW). Sabu had been known for his use of tables in matches, but Snow warned him that constantly breaking tables would only lead to the crowd demanding even more violent and dangerous stunts.
While Snow’s criticism may not be shared by everyone in the wrestling community, it does raise important questions about the long-term viability and appeal of deathmatch wrestling. As expectations from audiences continue to evolve, it remains to be seen whether this style of wrestling will be able to keep up or if it will eventually fade away.
In conclusion, Al Snow’s criticism of deathmatch wrestling brings attention to the potential limitations and challenges faced by this extreme style of wrestling. While there are fans who enjoy the violence and spectacle of these matches, Snow argues that they go against the principles of professional wrestling and may not be sustainable in the long run. As the wrestling industry continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see how deathmatch wrestling adapts or if it eventually fades away.